|
By
Robert Soares, CPA
Singer Lewak Greenbaum & Goldstein, LLP
NO HOLDS BARRED!
I'm sure most of you have heard the expression. It's a wrestling
term that basically gives each wrestler the green light to use any
and all techniques in his arsenal to win the match. Never before
has a term so perfectly fit the mentality that is required in the
creation of a meaningful budget for an Organization.
The budget process
has historically been regarded as a burdensome task that must be
undertaken to produce a product for which noncompliance with its
contents will be met with criticism at best and termination at worst.
To say that this is traditionally an unappreciated process would
be an act of charity. Truth be known, the process has been played
out on an uneven field, using the wrong ball and following a set
of outdated rules that serve no apparent purpose. The time has come
to reinvent the game starting with nothing more than the spirit
in which it was meant. It is likely that when this undertaking is
complete we will be left with a new process that looks very much
like the old one, but I assure you, if done properly, only those
steps that make the most sense and provide the most benefit will
survive. We will then be left with a stronger, more effective and
more efficient process by which budgets will be prepared.
Spirit of the
Budget
A budget should
be a planning tool utilized by an Organization to achieve its stated
mission. To better understand this statement, let's break it down
to its component parts. First of all, a budget is a tool used in
planning. This means that it is an object used prior to the undertaking
of a task that is designed to facilitate the success of this future
task. Next it is utilized by the Organization. This means that is
must not only be prepared but also reviewed and updated by the Organization.
But who is the Organization? It is really every single individual
in the Organization and the budget should be prepared and reviewed,
at least in part, by everyone in the Organization. The reason no
one should be left out of this process will be made clear in the
following sentences. Finally, the budget process should assist the
Organization in achieving its mission. This mission should be clear
and definite, not subject to interpretation and should be communicated
and understood by everyone in the Organization who has either a
direct of indirect effect on the Organization achieving this mission.
The reason this should be everyone as suggested above is that no
Organization should have on its payroll an individual who does not
contribute either directly or indirectly to the Organization achieving
its mission.
Think Outside
the Box
The biggest
shortcoming of most budgeting processes is the mentality of the
individuals preparing them. They limit themselves by following standard
formats, customary measurements and generally accepted assumptions.
Understand that budgets are not like the audited financial statements
prepared by your independent CPA's. Budgets do not have a governing
body dictating what must be included and how it must be formatted.
No place does it say that it must apply accounting principals or
be based in theories of finance. These are all limitations that
are self-inflicted and tremendously limit out budgets and significantly
hinder the acceptance of the budget and the budgeting process by
members of the Organization.
That this is
not to say eliminate all of this. At least some version of the budget
should exist in a financial statement format that resembles the
actual financial statements. This is necessary to allow the Organization
to measure actual results against this budget. Additionally, since
accounting is the language that explains business, is makes sense
for some form of the budget to be written in that language. The
key to remember is that this need not be the only version, or even
the version that is most commonly used by the Organization. Use
a version that makes the most sense to the Organization and best
conveys its current and future position on the track of achieving
its mission.
New Ideas
In the budgeting
process it is imperative not to discriminate. Every aspect of the
Organization is to be included. For example, invite the Board of
Directors to include a line item in the budget for benefits to be
received from the individuals on the Board and from the collective
effort of the Board. The logical budget item would be contributions,
but new customers, clients or suppliers are also items that can
be budgeted for as a result of the efforts of the Board of Directors.
Think about the benefits the Board provides to the Organization
and come up with a way to measure and track those benefits and these
are your budget items. During the year, at the cooperative meeting
to review and update the budget, discuss the variance between the
Board of Directors' budgeted amounts and actual results. Make certain
that the board is represented at this meeting and that this item
is discussed and analyzed in as much detail as any other line item.
Be creative
and understanding of everyone in the Organization. Since not everyone
subject to the budget understands financial statements and accounting,
it will undoubtedly be beneficial to include non-financial goals
in the budget. These could be items such as the amount of cash in
the bank, a calculation of occurrence of the problem that the Organization
has been established to correct or total new contributors to the
Organization. The possibilities are endless. The key is to tie in
the success and achievement of the budget in such a way so those
directly responsible for it can relate. Again, remember that there
are no rules. Ask what benefit an individual or department brings
to the Organization and use the most logical and direct measurement
of that item as the item to be budgeted for.
A good addition
to the budget is ratios and other relationships among various line
items. These need not be overly complex; for example, the percentage
of general and administrative expenditures to total expenditures
is something anyone can understand. It represents the percentage
of expenditures the Organization spends just existing without providing
the benefit that the Organization is designed to provide. Another
is fundraising income divided by fundraising expense, which tells
you the amount of money raised for every dollar spent trying to
raise money. Keeping trend analysis of these ratios make them much
more meaningful as well. It allows the Organization to track positive
and negative changes over time and provides for better information
when budgeting for the future.
Another helpful
item to be included with the budget is the preparation of flash
report cards. These are ideally the ten items that most define the
current position of the Organization in attaining its mission. They
should be simple to understand and information should be quick and
easy to obtain. They can be financial or non-financial by any logical
statistic or measurement. Some good examples are total revenues,
total number of members, some measure of public awareness of the
Organization or its cause. These items should be updated monthly,
weekly or daily, as most helpful to the Organization and compared
to the budget to provide the Organization with a quick idea of where
the Organization is on its track to achieve its mission. These flash
report cards will be the first indicators of short-term obstacles
and long-term problems to the Organization meeting its mission and
should bring about discussions from the Organization on ways to
overcome these obstacles and problems.
Word to the
Wise
Despite all
of the above, you should be certain not to put too much into a budget
so as to make it overbearing and cumbersome. This will only draw
attention away from the budget and as a result from the Organization
achieving its goals. Only those line items for which there is a
benefit should be included in the budget. (Notice that these items
must have a benefit and not just a reason.) All items for which
there is no benefit should be eliminated completely and no time
wasted on discussing them.
Desired Outcomes
The major outcome
of a budget should be to unite all members of the Organization to
one goal: achieving the mission. Only when everyone is on the same
page, working as one unit toward this goal, will it actually be
attainable. This is why the budgeting process must be a cooperative
process. This cooperative process does not mean the accounting department
preparing the budget for each department and handing it to them
to live by any more than handing each department a blank piece of
paper and telling them to come up with a request for the dollar
amount they would like to spend in the upcoming year. This cooperative
process should be a time when the Organization as a whole comes
together to discuss the budget. Logistically speaking, it may require
pre-meetings to be held by each department with one representative
from this meeting bringing to the Organization meeting the collective
ideas from the department. However, the more participants at the
Organization meeting, the greater the potential for both arriving
at a meaningful budget and having that budget be accepted and adhered
to by all members of the Organization.
Historically,
one of the most significant weaknesses of the budgeting process
has been the lack of accountability. The cooperative meeting mentioned
above is necessary if accountability with the budget will exist.
Even with the cooperative meeting this will be a challenge but without
it enforcing accountability will be perceived as nothing more than
scapegoating. Actual results attained must be compared with the
budget and a detailed analysis prepared. It must be stressed that
this process must be an honest assessment aimed at achieving the
Organization's goals and not merely direct attacks at certain individuals,
programs or departments. It must be one where hierarchy among individuals
is minimized. Only when everyone understands his role in ensuring
the success of the Organization's mission and feels free to express
his opinion on what needs to be done to that end will the process
be effective.
In this cooperative
meeting each individual or department should review actual results
against the budget and prepare an explanation of the variance that
is accompanied by a suggestion on how to correct it. Keep in mind
that whether you are discussing income or expenses, shortages and
overruns are equally harmful to the Organization and should be analyzed
with equal honesty and attention to detail. The only difference
between the harm caused by shortages and the harm caused by overruns
is the passage of time until the harm is noticed. For example, if
you are reviewing expenses, overruns will cause the Organization
to immediately spend resources that it does not have while shortages
will prevent the Organization from using resources in such a way
as to produce the maximum amount of benefit in the current period.
In most cases this reduced production of benefit relates directly
to diminished creation of resources in the future. With revenues
the terms are reversed but the same holds true.
Conclusion
If done properly
creating a meaningful budget will have tremendous long-term benefits
to the Organization. It may just be the catalyst that allows the
Organization to reach the next level and beyond. But for it to be
so the budgeting process must be a creative process. Don't fall
into the trap of using old recycled ideas and methodologies. Use
any method, any measurement, any system to display or communicate
the budget that intrinsically makes the most sense and provides
the most benefit to the Organization. Throw away the old rules,
grab the right ball and avoid the holes in the field. Doing otherwise
is asking to get hurt.
Robert Soares
is a manager at Singer Lewak Greenbaum & Goldstein LLP, Certified
Public Accountants & Management Consultants. He manages the
Los Angeles office's nonprofit services. Founded in 1959, SLGG is
now the 59th largest firm in the nation with offices in Los Angeles,
Santa Ana and Ontario. Soares can be reached at (310) 477-3924 or
by e-mail at rsoares@slgg.com.
|