ARBITRATION V. LITIGATION - WHICH SHOULD YOU FIGHT FOR?
By Daniel A. Platt, Partner, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

At some point in time, most businesses need to decide whether they prefer arbitration provisions in their agreements or not. In order to make an informed decision, and to make sure your lawyer understands what your needs and interests are, there are a few basic issues, which should be addressed. In order to make an informed decision, you will need to understand the not only the nature of the agreement, but how your company functions and what types of disputes are most likely to occur.

Arbitration v. Litigation

What Do You Have To Hide?
Unfortunately, a lawsuit involves a public airing of dirty laundry. Absent agreements to keep information confidential, any documents filed in court proceedings become a matter of public record. If you anticipate that certain information, which might become the subject of a lawsuit is confidential or proprietary, or that there is information which you would rather not be made public, a well-crafted arbitration agreement is probably your best protection. That said, you should be aware that any equitable relief, such as injunctions and prejudgment writs, are usually available only through the court.

Don't Be Penny Wise And Pound Foolish
Many people believe that arbitration is less expensive than going to court, and it usually is. Arbitrations tend to be less expensive in relatively simple cases where extensive discovery in not necessary, or in repetitive cases, such as consumer claims. However, in a complex case, the parties must consider the cost of the arbitrator, or panel of arbitrators, and, depending on what the terms of the arbitration provision are, attorneys' fees may not be significantly less. It should also be noted that just like in Court, attorneys' fees are generally only recoverable by the prevailing party if the agreement provides for it.

Things to Consider If You Choose Arbitration

Not All Arbitration Provisions Are Created Equally
There are many variables in arbitration agreements, including the choice of the arbitrator, the number of arbitrators, the rules of the arbitration, the law to be applied, the mediation process preceding arbitration, and its scope. A properly drafted arbitration clause needs to take into account all of the anticipated issues discussed above, as well as an analysis of the various state laws the parties can agree will apply.

There Are No Rules
One of the advantages of arbitration to a conventional lawsuit in court is that the parties can create any mechanism they choose to litigate their disputes. These mechanism range from conventional arbitration, to an arbitration before a panel of arbitrators, to jury trials to binding mediation, as well as anything and everything in between, including hybrids and multi-faceted approaches. Your legal counsel is best able to understand the varying complexities and will be well aware of all of the different approaches and be able to guide you accordingly with input from you, the client, on what you are trying to achieve.

Know Your Audience
If your friends' eyes glaze over when you describe your next big deal to them because they do not understand it due to technicalities or complexities, you run the risk that a jury, or even a judge, might not fully appreciate your brilliance as well. When dealing with highly complex or technical issues, it is often wise to make sure the parties to the agreement have some degree of control over who will decide the dispute, as well as whether the matter requires more than one arbitrator. This can be accomplished by deciding in advance who the arbitrator(s) will be, who will decide, or the process by which the arbitrator(s) will be selected. The alternative dispute resolution services have rules for selecting mediators and arbitrators, and those rules can be adopted by the parties to a contract, modified, or replaced.

Choosing An Arbitration Provider
When choosing to arbitrate a dispute, the parties can craft their own dispute resolution process, they can choose a process off the shelf by selecting an organization that has rules and procedures in place, or they can agree to adapt an ADR organization's rules to meet their needs. When selecting an ADR provider, in addition to cost, one must consider the types of neutrals typically employed by the service, e.g., lawyers, retired judges or industry experts, the amount of discovery permissible, and whether it has a reputation for making hard but firm decisions as compared to looking for a middle ground, or splitting the baby. The two largest ADR providers in California are Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, known as JAMS, and the American Arbitration Association, knows as the AAA.

So what does all of this mean?
You should speak to your lawyer about including an arbitration provision in your next agreement if:

  • In the event there is a lawsuit, you believe you are more likely to be the defendant than the plaintiff.
  • The contract is one to which many people with whom you have no relationship will be a party, such as a licensing agreement.
  • The likely subject of a lawsuit will require the finder of fact to have a certain expertise few people possess.
  • The likely subject of a lawsuit is something you prefer to keep confidential.

You may want to avoid an arbitration provision if:

  • You believe that in the event of a dispute, a jury is better suited to decide your claims.
  • You are not concerned about confidentiality.
  • The costs of the litigation are worth the ability to conduct full discovery and present the facts and theories to a judge or jury.



Daniel A. Platt is a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. He is a trial lawyer who represents companies in a vast array of industries, including software, hardware, internet, search, aviation, partnership disputes, contracts, banking, financial services, real estate, healthcare and employment. Dan also has an entrepreneurial background. Immediately prior to joining Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, he was President, Director and Executive Vice President of two joint venture projects with United Technologies Corporation. Those two companies collectively managed the largest transitioning fleet of commercial aircraft in the world. Dan can be reached in the Los Angeles office of Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP, an AmLaw Global 100 and BTI Top 30 Client Service law firm. Please feel free to share your comments and thoughts. His email is daniel.platt@kattenlaw.com.

 

 

Site Hosted by